There is literally no lower level of noobery.

You might as well lump yourself in with the faglocks, lagdrivers, noob tubes (duvolles), murder taxis, and Chromosome rail snipers at that point.

It takes no skill to chill there with an armor tank that has more ehp than a squad of AV can dish out in DPS in one second.

It takes no skill to use a weapon that slaughters infantry even at 100m, is perfectly accurate, and has the hit detection of 1.4 assault rifles.

If you KDR means that much to you, then you are playing the wrong game.

The real tankers brawl with railguns and missiles (hard mode). Every kill is earned. Every kill is done outside of the redline.

For those of you who are aspiring tankers, do not spec blasters- it is the fastest way to get yourself nerfed. This is obvious because Pyrex is running blasters- let's make a list of things he liked and things that got nerfed- same things in each category.

STOP BEING A PUBSTOMPING BLASTER TURRET TOTING NOOB...also don't redline railsnipe. That is just as bad.


EDIT: Also, don't jump out of your tank right before you die to preserve your KDR- another KDR ***** noob move. Real cavalrymen stay with their horses- There's a reason that the Old Breed called them White Stallions and Grey Mares.

[quote=Tailss Prower]

[quote=]
Ok for 1 im rail not blaster i almost always die with tank cause their are times i've lived with 50 hp and yes there is a lower form of noob its the ones who pack 15 RE's on a lav for a free instakill on a tank just because they doing so bad vs other infantry :P]

I prefer to run up to your tank and place REs on it, than to LAVBomb it. But some people aren't bad vs infantry there just tired of tank spam. But I see your point, majority of people who suck do this and people with skill get grouped into that same category.
Bastards.

Haha nice one, saying it takes skill to use railguns at close range. You and your absurd ideas. Also, only Maddy drivers are scrub s? Because armor tanks are 100x better than shield tanks this build right? You should be a comedian.

Hmmmm well using and RR or CR doesn't take much skill either....but I see your point. HAV are too damn jack of all trades, masters of all.

You forgot about the ar as well, and the scrambler to an extent, but not as little as the other rifles. I think that Havs could be easily fixed by fixing the turrets(range of the blaster and rapid fire mode of the rail), that way they lose flexibility outside of,what the weapon is meant to do.

lol the qq is so funny im going to kill 300 people tomorrow with a blaster and laugh the rest of the day, i hope you qqing little girls just try and stop me

Rail based of tanker's skill, you should be a comedian, unlesd you think it really takes skill to, point and hold R1. I'd love to see rail tankd kill blasters at close range without that function. The role of railguns sre to kill other vehicles at long ramge, except right now it rolld over the role of blasters by taking no player skill to put out more damage than a blaster at the range its suppose to be used at. And changing blaster range makes it harder to kill infantry, particularly AV after the swarm launcher range Nerf.

Are you ignorant or something? What makes the railgun any more of a main weapon than a blaster, it's just op, and it's not hard to hit a moving target without recoil. It's role is to shoot farther, not be better than the blaster at everything besides killing infantry, something that it shouldn't be doing well since it's a LARGE weapon. It doesn't even take a smart pilot, even a militia tank driver quickly figures out they have 3 rapid shots before overheating.

Ah yea, because rail turrets take skill..

Wtf is up with you "true tankers", you should be called "true tards".

Blaster Madrugars are the sole reason I tolerate the OPness of Rail Turrets. The people that run Blaster HAVs and whine about Railguns destroying them are the lowest of the low IMHO, even lower than Gallogi+KaalRR. The only casualties I even feel slightly bad about are the drop ship pilots, but I fear they might have to take yet another one for the team, we can't have Blaster HAVs run around unopposed.
Nothing can effectively counter them but Jihad Jeeps and Rail Turrets, and they have the audacity to ask for a Rail Turret nerf? Get real...

But a Madrugar can NEVER win against a rail/missile tank, if skill level is equal. Its a choice of prefered role: Either you kill infantry in your tank, or you kill tanks in your tank. As intended with the design.

This "real tanker" BS is getting on my nerves. Get the f*ck off your high horse Charlotte.

wait? railguns? makeing kills? not in the redline.

i will belive this when i see it.

1. yes its difficult and rewarding to kill infantry with missiles and rapes anything that is not a sica or gunnlogi or uses sheilds for that fact).

2. railgun is the noob turret. being able to 2-3 shot any vehicle when blasters and missiles require almost thier entire clip/heat to kill target vehicles and railguns cna pump out 6 shots befor over heat and each shot does 1000+ damage.

3. blasters do need a reduction in thier effective range vs infantry. however. as it is a turret it does not abide by the inafntrys gun range laws. comeing from a vehicle stand point the blaster has the worst range of the turrets. blasters put out most of thier damage from 200m and below. the closer the target is the more damage is applied. since infantry lacks resistence to vehicle turrets. they take considerble damge but not the turrets full damage.

4. vehicle large turret ranges are as follows

THE ENTIRE FREAKIN MAP as far as the railgun i concerened
roughly 500-400m for the missiles although they have that anoying dispersion beyond the 350m mark.
blasters are 200 and below.
5. like infantry wepaons turrets get range increases as thier tier goes up.
so if your being killed at roughly 200m by a blaster thank the ion cannon: murdering infantry since day of the enitrtey of dust 514 and my best friend.

5. chell got hurt badly by the blaster and procded tor age about it. must have been a cqc incident where the blaster murede his railgun in yoru face attempt.

Those were probably bad tankers then. A damage modded rail tank can 2-3 shot you through hardeners in CQC. It is NOT HARD MODE.

It's obvious how much of a liar you are, shooting farther isn't a role, I guesd neither is sniping. And it doesn't take much aiming, since both blasters and railguns have pinpoint accuracy. I'm pretty sure you're not understanding me, but I believe that thr blaster shouldn't be killing infamtry as easily as it does, which involves decreasing rof for damage per round and reducing range in exchange for the railgun losing it's rapid fire. If that happens, things suddenly become balanced for rail to blaster tanks, besides shield to armor tank balance of course.

Let's look at the facts:

Railguns put out more damage than blasters quicker

Railguns have more range than blasters

Their accuracy is identical

The blaster's rof makes it better suited for anti infantry work

Blasters step on the roles of small weapons.

tank plus 2 rail damage mods and any railgun = death to target tnak in 2-3 shots.

No, the rapid fire would ensure thst they stay op, that's whst needs to be removed.

Tailss, When did you start tanking? Always thought of you as a sniper (and a damn good one at that). Did you get bored with that or what? Just curious & hope you are well......Leadfoot

He also straight up sucked. He got about 4 kills while his team did all the work. His team won in spite of him. Along with more boots on the ground in proto gear. He just straight up sucks without a crutch.

This definitely applies to both railguns and blasters, which are ez mode in their respective roles. Stop pandering to the masses, please.

Charlotte -_- there is so much bull**** as to what you said ......you are in no place to talk about tanks ... you weren't in the closed beta you never use a tank unless you are in a squad with other tankers ....f anything RAIL GUNS are the pathetic turrets and always HAVE BEEN ... Missiles are the absolute peak of Useless ....... aside from the rest I mean What kind of missiles has a 1.5 meter blast radius Matter of fact............

THEY SHOULDN"T EVEN BE CALLED MISSILES BECAUSE THEY LACK THE ABILITY TO LOCK ON TO THEIR TARGETS THEY SHOULD BE CALLED ROCKETS.. minus the details....... another thing blasters.... Fit perfectly on a madrugar NO other turret can compare i mean thats the DEFAULT WEAPON ON AN ARMOR tank.... i really really LAUGH my lungs to a shrivel when i see a rail gun on an armor tank .....you have no clue how stupid that is tell me if this adds up

Slow chassis + Slow Turret

also " i really wish people would stop using the word " noob" cause most of the people who use it "Define the word spoken"

You commented me on my forum thread and you typed "Your Good join my corp" and i used a blaster tank ... so actually you're a fake ,pissed off loser who can't think out side the box to save his life ... i ought to report you for stupidity


q